Update
This commit is contained in:
@@ -88,11 +88,13 @@ shaft power. There is no forced power gain. Effective area/efficiency, gas
|
||||
properties and the base engine's approximate combustion/overlap affect these
|
||||
numbers strongly. They are prototype comparisons, not real engine predictions.
|
||||
|
||||
The benchmark used four solver substeps per output frame. The turbo cost .81
|
||||
The original benchmark used four solver substeps per output frame. The turbo cost .81
|
||||
CPU seconds per simulated second at 4000 RPM and 1.28 at 7000 RPM, versus .53
|
||||
for the unboosted twin. Sustained high-load real-time playback is an open issue;
|
||||
monitor underruns. The mixed transient cost .84 wall seconds per simulated
|
||||
second. Tests run headlessly; latest Windows runtime is unverified.
|
||||
second. The subsequent [optimization audit](OPTIMIZATION.md) resolves the
|
||||
subnormal-tracer slowdown and measures about .65 seconds per simulated second
|
||||
in its 7,000-RPM workload. Tests run headlessly; latest Windows runtime is unverified.
|
||||
|
||||
## Run
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user